2014 US Consulting
Financial Strength Rankings using Artificial Intelligence
| Top rated | 6 of 27 |
| Best rating | 259 % |
| Worst rating | < 0.001 % |
| New companies | 7 |
| Negative Economic Capital Ratio |
| Rank | Company | Seal | Rating Value | Trend | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 1 | Pharma Bio Serv Inc |  | 259.09% | 0.0 |  |
 | 2 | Mastech Digital Inc | | 206.11% | 7.0 |  |
 | 3 | ICF International Inc | | 201.77% | 2.0 |  |
 | 4 | Wilhelmina International Inc | | 201.52% | 2.0 | |
 | 5 | Navigant Consulting INC | | 199.26% | 2.0 | |
 | 6 | Hackett Group INC | | 193.11% | -2.0 |  |
 | 7 | Huron Consulting Group Inc | 192.36% | 1.0 | | |
 | 8 | Cartesian Inc | 190.02% | 0.0 |  | |
 | 9 | Towers Watson Co | 179.21% | 1.0 | | |
| 10 | Root9B Holdings Inc | 154.87% | 3.0 | | |
 | 11 | Information Services Group Inc | 147.31% | 1.0 | | |
| 12 | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp | 126.31% | -1.0 | | |
 | 13 | CEB Inc. | 124.95% | 1.0 | | |
| 14 | Juhl Energy Inc | 118.72% | 0.0 | | |
 | 15 | TSS Inc. | 110.55% | 2.0 | | |
 | 16 | Ryvyl Inc | 109.67% | 0.0 | | |
| 17 | 6D Global Technologies Inc | 107.52% | 0.0 | | |
 | 18 | Lightbridge Corp | 106.72% | -2.0 | | |
 | 19 | HPIL Holding | 92.22% | 0.0 | | |
| 20 | Bonds com Group Inc | 82.81% | 0.0 | | |
 | 21 | Hypha Labs Inc | 73.05% | 0.0 | | |
| 22 | Chuma Holdings INC | 52.89% | 7.0 | | |
 | 23 | Argentum 47 INC | 22.72% | 4.0 | | |
 | 24 | Astrana Health Inc | 21.55% | -5.0 |  | |
| 25 | Fortune Capital Financial Holding Corp | 7.65% | 0.0 | | |
 | 26 | Leopard Energy Inc | 0.00% | 0.0 | | |
 | 27 | Turnkey Capital Inc | 0.00% | 0.0 | | |
| Rank | Company | Seal | Rating Value | Trend |
Feature Distribution Plot
The Feature Distribution shows the main industry variables and the distribution of their impact on financial strength. The more important a variable, the broader the distribution. As the effects are calculated relative to the industry average, half of the companies have a positive effect (green) and half have a negative effect (red).
Regression Plot
The Regression compares the forecasted company valuation with the observed stock market values. A positive correlation suggests that the model effectively explains market prices.
Feature Importance
