2014 US Consulting
Financial Strength Rankings using Artificial Intelligence
| Top rated | 6 of 26 |
| Best rating | 292 % |
| Worst rating | -1,525 % |
| New companies | 6 |
| Negative Economic Capital Ratio | 10 of 26 |
| Rank | Company | Seal | Rating Value | Trend | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 1 | Pharma Bio Serv Inc |  | 291.96% | 0.0 |  |
 | 2 | ICF International Inc | | 174.79% | 2.0 |  |
 | 3 | Wilhelmina International Inc | | 170.66% | 2.0 | |
 | 4 | Navigant Consulting INC | | 169.01% | 2.0 | |
 | 5 | Mastech Digital Inc | | 166.64% | 3.0 | |
 | 6 | Cartesian Inc | | 161.32% | 0.0 |  |
 | 7 | Hackett Group INC | 155.01% | -4.0 |  | |
 | 8 | Huron Consulting Group Inc | 151.43% | -1.0 | | |
 | 9 | Towers Watson Co | 123.68% | 2.0 | | |
| 10 | Root9B Holdings Inc | 112.26% | 0.0 | | |
 | 11 | Information Services Group Inc | 63.47% | 2.0 | | |
 | 12 | Lightbridge Corp | 40.18% | -3.0 | | |
| 13 | Juhl Energy Inc | 23.39% | 0.0 | | |
 | 14 | CEB Inc. | 22.13% | 0.0 | | |
| 15 | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp | 21.82% | -3.0 | | |
 | 16 | TSS Inc. | 7.43% | 0.0 | | |
 | 17 | Hpil Holding | -24.54% | 0.0 | | |
| 18 | 6D Global Technologies Inc | -29.75% | 0.0 | | |
 | 19 | Ryvyl Inc | -104.70% | 0.0 | | |
| 20 | Bonds com Group Inc | -148.79% | -2.0 | | |
 | 21 | Hypha Labs Inc | -254.22% | 0.0 | | |
| 22 | Chuma Holdings INC | -370.56% | 5.0 |  | |
 | 23 | Astrana Health Inc | -393.27% | -6.0 |  | |
 | 24 | Argentum 47 INC | -444.95% | 2.0 | | |
 | 25 | Leopard Energy Inc | -1377.11% | 0.0 | | |
 | 26 | Turnkey Capital Inc | -1525.16% | 0.0 | | |
| Rank | Company | Seal | Rating Value | Trend |
Feature Distribution Plot
The Feature Distribution shows the main industry variables and the distribution of their impact on financial strength. The more important a variable, the broader the distribution. As the effects are calculated relative to the industry average, half of the companies have a positive effect (green) and half have a negative effect (red).
Regression Plot
The Regression compares the forecasted company valuation with the observed stock market values. A positive correlation suggests that the model effectively explains market prices.
Feature Importance
